Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2016 21:31:59 GMT -8
Aren't the 4 who signed the best recruiting class in the programs history?
|
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on May 5, 2016 22:18:58 GMT -8
Aren't the 4 who signed the best recruiting class in the programs history? As mentioned, yes. But, a long way to go to be the best class in a whole bunch of ways. The seniors set the bar pretty high as a class of young women and hoopsters. Let's hope they strive to reach and surpass that mark. |
|
|
|
Post by jdogge on May 6, 2016 14:17:18 GMT -8
How does this class rank among other universities? |
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on May 6, 2016 14:29:06 GMT -8
Here is one ranking I saw... not sure how old. But we're only 5th in Pac 12:
1 Maryland
2 Baylor
3 Texas
4 Florida State
5 Notre Dame
6 Louisville
7 Oregon
8 Ohio State
9 Stanford
10 Arizona State
11 USC
12 Michigan State
13 North Carolina
14 Connecticut
15 TCU
16 Oregon State
17 Vanderbilt
18 NC State
19 Dayton
20 Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
Post by beavdowg on May 8, 2016 20:04:39 GMT -8
I say, just let Rueck keep winning and our class ranking will rise and rise and rise.
Go Beavs!
|
|
|
|
Post by beavadelic on May 9, 2016 12:41:08 GMT -8
Here is one ranking I saw... not sure how old. But we're only 5th in Pac 12: 1 Maryland 2 Baylor 3 Texas 4 Florida State 5 Notre Dame 6 Louisville 7 Oregon 8 Ohio State 9 Stanford 10 Arizona State 11 USC 12 Michigan State 13 North Carolina 14 Connecticut 15 TCU 16 Oregon State 17 Vanderbilt 18 NC State 19 Dayton 20 Oklahoma UConn and Dino must be sweating with only the 14th ranked class. I mean, if you can't be #1 in recruiting after winning something like 120,000 straight games, what does it take? (Heavy sarcasm here). If the formula is the same as it is in football, a team that signs 6 3-stars could be "ranked" higher than one with 2 5-stars and 2 4-stars. The comparison is meaningless. I feel like Rueck filled his needs - other than another 6'6" shot-blocking machine to replace Ruth - very well with highly-touted players. You have to get talent, and all of the programs certainly did, but then it's about coaching them up. There aren't many coaches on the planet who can do a better job of that than Scott does! |
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on May 9, 2016 17:26:14 GMT -8
I agree for the most part... but getting the type of "coachable" players SR has gotten is getting harder and harder... cuz they are fewer and farther between in this instant gratification world kids live in. The tough part is sustaining... getting to this point is way easier than staying there. That is what makes UConn's success incredible, but tougher to maintain in this day and age.
|
|
