|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Oct 30, 2016 15:38:28 GMT -8
Oregon State's current strength of schedule:
Sagarin: 10
Colley: 4
Massey: 21
Anderson & Hester: 4
ESPN has a statistic that ranks each game based upon how well a team did based upon its competition. Oregon State's games this year:
1. California (79)
2. Washingon State (57)
3. Idaho State (51)
4. @minnesota (48)
5. @washington (37)
6. @colorado (32)
7. Utah (31)
8. Boise State (29)
|
|
|
|
Post by mbabeav on Oct 30, 2016 21:42:19 GMT -8
We make the schedule so far in advance and base it on the team's performance at the time. We just have to factor it in.
|
|
|
|
Post by snohobeav on Oct 30, 2016 21:46:49 GMT -8
Oregon State's current strength of schedule: Sagarin: 10 Colley: 4 Massey: 21 Anderson & Hester: 4 ESPN has a statistic that ranks each game based upon how well a team did based upon its competition. Oregon State's games this year: 1. California (79) 2. Washingon State (57) 3. Idaho State (51) 4. @minnesota (48) 5. @washington (37) 6. @colorado (32) 7. Utah (31) 8. Boise State (29) What do the 1-8 rankings mean? And the #s in parentheses? 1= or best performance given the opponent? |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Oct 31, 2016 12:45:19 GMT -8
Oregon State's current strength of schedule: Sagarin: 10 Colley: 4 Massey: 21 Anderson & Hester: 4 ESPN has a statistic that ranks each game based upon how well a team did based upon its competition. Oregon State's games this year: 1. California (79) 2. Washington State (57) 3. Idaho State (51) 4. @minnesota (48) 5. @washington (37) 6. @colorado (32) 7. Utah (31) 8. Boise State (29) What do the 1-8 rankings mean? And the #s in parentheses? 1= or best performance given the opponent? The number in paren is the game score. High is good. Low is bad. The ranking is merely ordering those numbers in descending order. |
|
|
|
Post by kersting13 on Oct 31, 2016 13:44:31 GMT -8
What do the 1-8 rankings mean? And the #s in parentheses? 1= or best performance given the opponent? The number in paren is the game score. High is good. Low is bad. The ranking is merely ordering those numbers in descending order. They graded our performance vs Colorado almost identically to our performance against Utah?? I find these gradings suspect. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Oct 31, 2016 13:54:02 GMT -8
The number in paren is the game score. High is good. Low is bad. The ranking is merely ordering those numbers in descending order. They graded our performance vs Colorado almost identically to our performance against Utah?? I find these gradings suspect. The program rates Colorado the 13th best team in the country and probable South champion. According to the program, Utah is 36th and probable South runner up. The program also tends to focus a lot on where the game was played. Losing bad on the road to a 10-2 team looks better than losing at home to a 9-3 team. |
|
