|
Post by orangeattack on Jul 12, 2019 9:18:00 GMT -8
I figured it was just too easy of a debate over who is the greatest Defensive Coordinator in OSU history (Banker, duh).
But the best defensive coach? This is a tougher debate, we have had a bunch of good assistants. State your case, and use facts not emotions, or I will sic Wilky on you.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Jul 12, 2019 10:12:33 GMT -8
I figured it was just too easy of a debate over who is the greatest Defensive Coordinator in OSU history (Banker, duh). But the best defensive coach? This is a tougher debate, we have had a bunch of good assistants. State your case, and use facts not emotions, or I will sic Wilky on you. Hold up.....Banker is not a duh, no-brainer. I will take Rocky Long over Banker. Rocky had a lot less talent to work with as well.
|
|
|
Post by orangeattack on Jul 12, 2019 10:35:41 GMT -8
I figured it was just too easy of a debate over who is the greatest Defensive Coordinator in OSU history (Banker, duh). But the best defensive coach? This is a tougher debate, we have had a bunch of good assistants. State your case, and use facts not emotions, or I will sic Wilky on you. Hold up.....Banker is not a duh, no-brainer. I will take Rocky Long over Banker. Rocky had a lot less talent to work with as well. Banker definitely benefited from some of the best talent evaluation in the history of the program - I offer up the relative ranking of Oregon State's classes versus the number of draft picks produced by the Beavers as evidence. I get what you're saying about Rocky having less talent to work with. I don't have the time or the ability to create some sort of quantitative measurement of the two relative to performance vs talent but my gut feeling is that Banker probably "overachieved" with defensive talent vs defensive ranking more than any other OSU coach. I also feel that Rocky's defenses were playing in a different era entirely, where there was less pressure on a defense and because of how inept the OSU offense often was, they were playing much of the second half against second and third stringers in garbage time, versus the perpetual dogfights that Banker found himself in with the Riley offense in place.
|
|
|
Post by qbeaver on Jul 12, 2019 11:25:32 GMT -8
Banker was good until he had to face offenses that were more wide open...then it got ugly. Against pro style offenses,we were solid. We didn't have the athletes with discipline who could even slow down the wide open offenses. Banker could never adapt to the spread offenses that we saw become popular in the mid to late 2000's. Rocky was far better overall imo...
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Jul 12, 2019 12:10:55 GMT -8
Lots of posters downgrade Banker's coaching ability because of the success the ucks had moving against his defense... without looking at how the rest of the league handled the ucks offense. The ucks had a couple of years that they moved on pretty much EVERYBODY in the league, for the most part they were less successful against the Beavs than other defenses in the league.
|
|
|
Post by orangeattack on Jul 12, 2019 12:19:35 GMT -8
Banker was good until he had to face offenses that were more wide open...then it got ugly. Against pro style offenses,we were solid. We didn't have the athletes with discipline who could even slow down the wide open offenses. Banker could never adapt to the spread offenses that we saw become popular in the mid to late 2000's. Rocky was far better overall imo... why is "wide open" so commonly used as a euphemism for the spread option? It just strikes me as weird. Especially now that it has really fallen out of favor and is no longer dominant, since the rest of the league has pretty much caught up (see Chip Kelly at UCLA now). The thing is leaving the emotional frustration out of it, Banker wasn't great but he was slightly better than average against the spread option, relative to his peers. And to me, that's the real measuring stick is how he stacked up against other DC's... and it's crazy to me that you say Banker could never adapt to "mid-2000's offenses" when literally 05-06-07, smack in the middle of the 2000's, were the best defenses OSU ever had. Banker's defenses struggled for a little while with mobile QB's but it didn't last forever. Ortege Jenkins got wrecked by OSU. Jake Locker got wrecked by OSU. D-Dog spent a whole game shadowing Dennis Dixon and eating him up. The spread option came along and exploited the basic tenet of Bankerball - take away the deep ball by disrupting the timing of the WR, plug the middle and string the ball out to the sidelines where the OLB's and safeties can clean up. Hustle and pursuit, 11 hats to the ball. Now here comes an offense that has the entire GOAL of stringing the play out to the sidelines and creating cutback lanes. It was kryptonite and not only does Banker have to rethink his whole basic strategy, he also has to teach different keys, responsibilities, and arguably look for different athletes. Of COURSE that will take time to do. Obviously the teams with superior athletes are going to make this transition quicker but yet Banker still manages to at least be average - despite recruiting guys to play his system, his style of D. TL, DR: Banker gets a bum rap for his performance against the spread option offenses that came along circa 2009/2010
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Jul 12, 2019 12:25:54 GMT -8
Stats:
Long: 1991 5.6 yards/play (84th) 1992 5.8 yards/play (97th) 1993 5.2 yards/play (49th) 1994 5.0 yards/play (46th) 1995 4.2 yards/play (9th)
Banker: 2003 4.1 yards/play (2nd) 2004 4.4 yards/play (8th) 2005 5.8 yards/play (87th) 2006 5.3 yards/play (59th) 2007 4.5 yards/play (7th) 2008 5.0 yards/play (41st) 2009 5.4 yards/play (61st) 2010 5.7 yards/play (71st) 2011 5.9 yards/play (87th) 2012 5.2 yards/play (38th) 2013 6.1 yards/play (100th) 2014 5.8 yards/play (87th)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2019 12:31:09 GMT -8
Stats: Long: 1991 5.6 yards/play (84th) 1992 5.8 yards/play (97th) 1993 5.2 yards/play (49th) 1994 5.0 yards/play (46th) 1995 4.2 yards/play (9th) Banker: 2003 4.1 yards/play (2nd) 2004 4.4 yards/play (8th) 2005 5.8 yards/play (87th) 2006 5.3 yards/play (59th) 2007 4.5 yards/play (7th) 2008 5.0 yards/play (41st) 2009 5.4 yards/play (61st) 2010 5.7 yards/play (71st) 2011 5.9 yards/play (87th) 2012 5.2 yards/play (38th) 2013 6.1 yards/play (100th) 2014 5.8 yards/play (87th) Those guys who say stats are for losers. They just don't know.
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Jul 12, 2019 12:34:20 GMT -8
Long coached against a lot more vanilla offenses back in the early to mid-1990s. Banker's best three seasons were better than Long's best season. Banker's best five seasons were better than Long's best two seasons. Having said that, Long never had a stinker like 2013.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Jul 12, 2019 12:34:28 GMT -8
Hold up.....Banker is not a duh, no-brainer. I will take Rocky Long over Banker. Rocky had a lot less talent to work with as well. Banker definitely benefited from some of the best talent evaluation in the history of the program - I offer up the relative ranking of Oregon State's classes versus the number of draft picks produced by the Beavers as evidence. I get what you're saying about Rocky having less talent to work with. I don't have the time or the ability to create some sort of quantitative measurement of the two relative to performance vs talent but my gut feeling is that Banker probably "overachieved" with defensive talent vs defensive ranking more than any other OSU coach. I also feel that Rocky's defenses were playing in a different era entirely, where there was less pressure on a defense and because of how inept the OSU offense often was, they were playing much of the second half against second and third stringers in garbage time, versus the perpetual dogfights that Banker found himself in with the Riley offense in place. They were playing most of the 1st half as well, due to the 10 fumbles/game in the Pettibone era. There's no way to compare based on stats because the game changed dramatically (sorry wilky), but I will go off the fact that Rocky continued to have great success at New Mexico & SD State, while Banker did not at Nebraska.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Jul 12, 2019 12:39:57 GMT -8
Long coached against a lot more vanilla offenses back in the early to mid-1990s. Banker's best three seasons were better than Long's best season. Banker's best five seasons were better than Long's best two seasons. Having said that, Long never had a stinker like 2013. Look at the rosters. We had players back then for Rocky that should have never sniffed the field. Your stats mean nothing unless the talent level and the style of football was the same, which it wasn't
|
|
|
Post by qbeaver on Jul 12, 2019 12:49:05 GMT -8
I actually like Craig Bray as a defensive co-ordinator better than Banker. It is true,Rocky coached at osu a long time ago,and maybe my memory of him isn't as good as watching my hopes of going to a Rose Bowl get eviscerated at Reser by the uo 65-38 when we looked like a little league defense. Those kind of emotional losses stick with me watching the Banker defenses when my expectations are peaking.
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Jul 12, 2019 13:01:49 GMT -8
Banker definitely benefited from some of the best talent evaluation in the history of the program - I offer up the relative ranking of Oregon State's classes versus the number of draft picks produced by the Beavers as evidence. I get what you're saying about Rocky having less talent to work with. I don't have the time or the ability to create some sort of quantitative measurement of the two relative to performance vs talent but my gut feeling is that Banker probably "overachieved" with defensive talent vs defensive ranking more than any other OSU coach. I also feel that Rocky's defenses were playing in a different era entirely, where there was less pressure on a defense and because of how inept the OSU offense often was, they were playing much of the second half against second and third stringers in garbage time, versus the perpetual dogfights that Banker found himself in with the Riley offense in place. They were playing most of the 1st half as well, due to the 10 fumbles/game in the Pettibone era. There's no way to compare based on stats because the game changed dramatically (sorry wilky), but I will go off the fact that Rocky continued to have great success at New Mexico & SD State, while Banker did not at Nebraska. Define "great success." Defensive rank adjusted for schedule: 2005 Oregon State 30 New Mexico 56
2006 Oregon State 35 New Mexico 58
2007 Oregon State 1 New Mexico 29
2008 Oregon State 22 New Mexico 30
2009 Oregon State 64 San Diego State 96
2010 San Diego State 52 Oregon State 56
2011 Oregon State 66 San Diego State 80
2012 Oregon State 16 San Diego State 59
2013 Oregon State 51 San Diego State 60
2014 San Diego State 50 Oregon State 67
Banker 8 - Long 2.
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Jul 12, 2019 13:09:07 GMT -8
In 1995, we gave up 20 to ASU, 26 to Washington, 13 to Cal, 14 to Arizona, 28 to USC and 12 to oregon, and lost every one of those games. We played incredible defense that year, especially considering how little help we got from our offense because it was so pitiful.
In 1994 we gave up 22 to ASU, 24 to Fresno, 27 to USC, 24 to Washington and 17 to oregon. And lost every one of those games.
Those defenses most definitely were not playing against backups, because the games were so competitive.
Rocky Long was a miracle worker. He also had outstanding assistants.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Jul 12, 2019 13:11:03 GMT -8
They were playing most of the 1st half as well, due to the 10 fumbles/game in the Pettibone era. There's no way to compare based on stats because the game changed dramatically (sorry wilky), but I will go off the fact that Rocky continued to have great success at New Mexico & SD State, while Banker did not at Nebraska. Define "great success." Defensive rank adjusted for schedule: 2005 Oregon State 30 New Mexico 56
2006 Oregon State 35 New Mexico 58
2007 Oregon State 1 New Mexico 29
2008 Oregon State 22 New Mexico 30
2009 Oregon State 64 San Diego State 96
2010 San Diego State 52 Oregon State 56
2011 Oregon State 66 San Diego State 80
2012 Oregon State 16 San Diego State 59
2013 Oregon State 51 San Diego State 60
2014 San Diego State 50 Oregon State 67
Banker 8 - Long 2./ Again....look at the talent level he was working with. Long had very good records coaching at both schools with far less talent. He was also playing some out of conference body bag games against greatly superior teams that are going to greatly skew your "stats".
|
|