|
Post by lebaneaver on Nov 4, 2017 22:09:45 GMT -8
I was never a "Tedford fan," but he's taken a team that was 1-11 last year, and has turned them into a bowl eligible team. Cal isn't the easiest of teams to recruit to (standards, and all), but nearly every year he was at the helm, they were in the conference conversation. I have NO IDEA if he would entertain coming to Corvallis after the CGA debacle, and I know he isn't a spring chicken, but.....the more I see, the more I SEE. Just my take.
|
|
|
Post by beavadelic on Nov 5, 2017 9:35:32 GMT -8
I was never a "Tedford fan," but he's taken a team that was 1-11 last year, and has turned them into a bowl eligible team. Cal isn't the easiest of teams to recruit to (standards, and all), but nearly every year he was at the helm, they were in the conference conversation. I have NO IDEA if he would entertain coming to Corvallis after the CGA debacle, and I know he isn't a spring chicken, but.....the more I see, the more I SEE. Just my take. Tedford made no secret of the fact that he wanted the job 3 years ago. I’d bet he’d entertain this now just for the fact that it could get him back into the pac 12. The guy can coach and recruit, and I’d be real happy to have him in the mix
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Nov 5, 2017 9:41:03 GMT -8
I think this year he's the beneficiary of a super easy schedule and a good qb. I think he'd be solid at OSU, but for those clammoring for more success than we had with Coach Riley I think it will be pretty similar.
|
|
|
Post by rockybeav on Nov 5, 2017 10:01:23 GMT -8
I was never a "Tedford fan," but he's taken a team that was 1-11 last year, and has turned them into a bowl eligible team. Cal isn't the easiest of teams to recruit to (standards, and all), but nearly every year he was at the helm, they were in the conference conversation. I have NO IDEA if he would entertain coming to Corvallis after the CGA debacle, and I know he isn't a spring chicken, but.....the more I see, the more I SEE. Just my take. Extremely easy schedule this year. Still lost to UNLV, who are terrible (lost to Howard and set a Vegas record on upset betting lines). Tedford doesn’t excite me. He would be an improvement, but few coaches wouldn’t be after GA’s mess. I’d rather take a calculated risk in Baldwin or Norvell. Their upside is greater. Riskier, sure, but that’s something I’d be fine with. Plus if Cal is hard to recruit to, what makes you think he will do any better at OSU? If Barnes wants the safe and solid pick, Tedford is the guy. His last few years at Cal were in decline, similar to Riley. Plus, we have any idea what his health issues were/are? In short, he’d be a solid to borderline good hire, but to say great is an overstatement in my opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2017 10:51:44 GMT -8
Id be okay with Tedford. He is a very good coach and recruiter. Not my top choice but I wouldn't hate it.
As for why Cal is hard to recruit too, its not getting kids to want to go there; its getting kids academically qualified. He wouldn't have that issue at OSU so that is why you could expect him to recruit well to Corvallis.
|
|
|
Post by gobeavs92 on Nov 5, 2017 11:27:12 GMT -8
None of us know what will happen with the next coach and how they will do here, no matter who it is. Easy schedule or not, he has done it twice now! He has taken a team that previously won one game the year before and the next year (his first) put them in a bowl game. Anybody can skew anything to fit their point, but winning speaks for itself and Tedford is a proven winner! If you have watched their games, fundamentally, they are very good on both sides of the ball. Defensively, they are very well coached, fly around and execute well. Offensively, of course, they are putting up points and moving the ball consistently. McMaryion is getting the best coaching he has ever received at the QB position because Tedford is an elite QB coach and offensive mind.
Here is what you will get with Tedford; Good/great QB play, an offense that will put points on the board and move the ball against multiple defenses, a familiarity with the PAC 12 teams, good recruiting (especially in California) and from what I have seen lately, a solid defense. I think Tedford, as all coaches do, has grown a little bit more to respect and make sure that the defensive side of the ball receives as much attention as the offensive side of the ball. When he was at Oregon as the OC under Belotti, they did not give the defense the same attention as the offense (especially in recruiting). When at Cal, he did this at times too.
Let me ask, why are Norvell and Baldwin's ceilings higher or have more "upside" in your mind? Because they are younger? I'll be honest, if a guy like Bill Parcells (unrealistic example but helps prove my point) was available and wanted to coach here, I would take him over probably any coaches (let alone younger ones). Why? Well his record and pedigree speak for themselves but he would also bring in top notch assistants with experience and probably some other younger coaches to groom that could take over when he would possibly depart. In that case, there are no guarantees of how long any coach stays, young or older. This is establishing a program. So when it comes to having someone come in here and build up the program, I want someone who can do it sooner than later.
I think Baldwin would struggle for a bit with recruiting a well rounded team (players in all phases) here for a few years. He might get some offensive skill talent but I doubt he'd be able to get any quality "trench" players (LOS) and defensive talent needed for PAC 12 competition for a few years at least! Part of that recruiting deficiency (IMO) would also be due to the fact that I'm not sure he could get the assistant coaches that have experience to surround him. I could be wrong but I just can't see him bringing in many if any, PAC 12 experienced coaches that would work under him (considering his lack of experience in the conference as a coach, let alone an HC). Again, I could be wrong but no more right or wrong than anyone else with their opinions, those are just my concerns with Baldwin. He obviously is a good offensive mind and has had success at FCS level as a HC.
Norvell was another coach I have mentioned. I have watched Memphis a few times this season and he is pretty impressive. They do play against inferior talent, but again, the guy is winning games and they do play a good brand of football from what I have seen. He knows the PAC 12 but he does have some limited experience. Not only as an HC but even as a coordinator. Again, wouldn't dislike him being here but his inexperience might be a concern with gathering a strong group of experienced/good assistant coaches and coordinators. Also, recruiting. Would he be a well rounded recruiter? Or would he be an all in "offensive guy"? He has spent most f his coaching career on the offensive side of the ball.
For the most part, no matter who is hired, I will support them as I did with GA for the first couple of seasons but then there needs to be results. I wont support Rick New-weasel or any Wing/Triple option offenses though!
Another bit of food for thought about hiring a "young energetic" coach vs an experienced HC that is a proven winner. Imagine if when Riley left the first time, if DE was looked over because of age or what have you , for some younger guy? It's impossible to know, but I don't think Oregon State reaches the heights they did in Erickson's stretch (that's my opinion). He brought in; knowledge, he was a proven winner but he also brought in great assistant coaches!
Go Beavs!
|
|
|
Post by rockybeav on Nov 5, 2017 12:47:47 GMT -8
None of us know what will happen with the next coach and how they will do here, no matter who it is. Easy schedule or not, he has done it twice now! He has taken a team that previously won one game the year before and the next year (his first) put them in a bowl game. Anybody can skew anything to fit their point, but winning speaks for itself and Tedford is a proven winner! If you have watched their games, fundamentally, they are very good on both sides of the ball. Defensively, they are very well coached, fly around and execute well. Offensively, of course, they are putting up points and moving the ball consistently. McMaryion is getting the best coaching he has ever received at the QB position because Tedford is an elite QB coach and offensive mind. Here is what you will get with Tedford; Good/great QB play, an offense that will put points on the board and move the ball against multiple defenses, a familiarity with the PAC 12 teams, good recruiting (especially in California) and from what I have seen lately, a solid defense. I think Tedford, as all coaches do, has grown a little bit more to respect and make sure that the defensive side of the ball receives as much attention as the offensive side of the ball. When he was at Oregon as the OC under Belotti, they did not give the defense the same attention as the offense (especially in recruiting). When at Cal, he did this at times too. Let me ask, why are Norvell and Baldwin's ceilings higher or have more "upside" in your mind? Because they are younger? I'll be honest, if a guy like Bill Parcells (unrealistic example but helps prove my point) was available and wanted to coach here, I would take him over probably any coaches (let alone younger ones). Why? Well his record and pedigree speak for themselves but he would also bring in top notch assistants with experience and probably some other younger coaches to groom that could take over when he would possibly depart. In that case, there are no guarantees of how long any coach stays, young or older. This is establishing a program. So when it comes to having someone come in here and build up the program, I want someone who can do it sooner than later. I think Baldwin would struggle for a bit with recruiting a well rounded team (players in all phases) here for a few years. He might get some offensive skill talent but I doubt he'd be able to get any quality "trench" players (LOS) and defensive talent needed for PAC 12 competition for a few years at least! Part of that recruiting deficiency (IMO) would also be due to the fact that I'm not sure he could get the assistant coaches that have experience to surround him. I could be wrong but I just can't see him bringing in many if any, PAC 12 experienced coaches that would work under him (considering his lack of experience in the conference as a coach, let alone an HC). Again, I could be wrong but no more right or wrong than anyone else with their opinions, those are just my concerns with Baldwin. He obviously is a good offensive mind and has had success at FCS level as a HC. Norvell was another coach I have mentioned. I have watched Memphis a few times this season and he is pretty impressive. They do play against inferior talent, but again, the guy is winning games and they do play a good brand of football from what I have seen. He knows the PAC 12 but he does have some limited experience. Not only as an HC but even as a coordinator. Again, wouldn't dislike him being here but his inexperience might be a concern with gathering a strong group of experienced/good assistant coaches and coordinators. Also, recruiting. Would he be a well rounded recruiter? Or would he be an all in "offensive guy"? He has spent most f his coaching career on the offensive side of the ball. For the most part, no matter who is hired, I will support them as I did with GA for the first couple of seasons but then there needs to be results. I wont support Rick New-weasel or any Wing/Triple option offenses though! Another bit of food for thought about hiring a "young energetic" coach vs an experienced HC that is a proven winner. Imagine if when Riley left the first time, if DE was looked over because of age or what have you , for some younger guy? It's impossible to know, but I don't think Oregon State reaches the heights they did in Erickson's stretch (that's my opinion). He brought in; knowledge, he was a proven winner but he also brought in great assistant coaches! Go Beavs! First, thanks for respectfully disagreeing with me and offering detailed reasons as to why you have concerns about Baldwin and Norvell. I genuinely mean that. I try not to post often, because a lot of these threads result in name-calling and flat out rudeness. I have been posting more, because the prospect of a new coach is exciting and nerve-wracking. So again, thanks for the respectful post. I will attempt to reciprocate! My primary concern is Tedford's last three seasons at Cal, where he went a combined 15-22: 5-7 season, 7-5 season, and 3-9 season. The fact that it was a downward trend concerns me. What caused this to happen? Recruiting lapses? The game/conference "passing him by?" I don't have the answer for this, but if he is interviewed I would want some detailed answers as to how his tenure ended. Perhaps there are good reasons/excuses for it. Second, his health concerns me. I have zero concerns about Tedford's age. In previous posts I have mentioned that Les Miles (turns 64 sometime soon) would be a top 3 choice for me because of his background and the benefits he would bring from a recruiting and fundraising standpoint. Tedford had to resign/take an extended medical leave because of a heart procedure in 2014. Here's a link: www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000399495/article/jeff-tedford-taking-medical-leave-from-buccaneersIf his health is fine, then obviously this wouldn't be a concern for me. A terrible situation for OSU would be if Tedford had to leave after a year or two because of medical reasons. Overall, he just doesn't excite me. Again, I wouldn't necessarily be disappointed by this hire, but I wouldn't be excited either. Would we improve? Sure, I just think the ceiling could be lower than with other coaches. In response to a previous poster, I understand Cal has difficult admissions processes. GA felt the same at Wisconsin, and he still couldn't get Craig Evans into OSU. I don't think Oregon State has "easy" standards by any means. Easier than Cal's? Sure. How many "great" players are going to be in that window between OSU's admissions and Cal's admissions? Your concerns about Baldwin and Norvell are legitimate. The risks for them are greater, but I still feel the upside would also be greater. Baldwin has 9 years of head coaching experience. Coached a in multiple "real" playoffs and won a National Championship. He uses the strengths of his personnel, and he isn't stubborn in trying to utilize one particular system. Has been noted to "steal" good ideas from other coaches, and I like that he's open-minded. Your concern about his ability to get top-notch assistants is my biggest concern. I think his HC experience and his (almost 1 year) of P12 experience would be enough to make good decisions on personnel. His EWU teams averaged 42 points per game in his last year there. Think about that, his offenses averaged 6 touchdowns per game. Yes it was a Big Sky school. Again, he had Big Sky talent versus Big Sky Talent. Plus, he whooped our a$$ at home, identified Vernon Adams as a QB prospect (Banker recruited him as a DB), and beat WSU. He took UW to the wire in Peterson's first year I believe, AT UW. The Eagles scored 42 points per game in 2016, third-best in the FCS. They had a top-20 scoring offense in 2015, after they were No. 1 in 2014 and No. 7 in 2013. My point? His offenses are not only good, they are CONSISTENTLY good. Norvell just checks all the boxes for me in an "up and comer" to lead a P5 program. Coordinator experience, head coach for 1+ seasons at Memphis. Sure he plays inferior talent, but he is coaching Memphis, not Ohio State. I doubt the talent on his team is significantly greater than his opponents. His offenses are explosive, which I think would help with recruiting. 16-6 record as a HC at Memphis. Risk for Norvell? He's winning with Fuente's players, and I have no clue at how good of a recruiter he is.
|
|
|
Post by seastape on Nov 5, 2017 13:18:25 GMT -8
I wouldn't mind Tedford, but I wouldn't be excited. I do believe that Tedford would come in and install a professionalism to the team that it has been lacking since we had that guy from Logan here, and I think the team needs that almost more than anything else. I would also trust Tedford to get the QB situation going in a positive direction, which is again something we haven't seen since Mannion left. And again, Tedford has doen an outstanding job at Fresno St. this year. People talk about an easy schedule, but he did beat San Diego St., which was able to take down a couple Pac 12 teams this year. That is a positive.
However, I think the reservations about Tedford are real. He did decline near the end of his tenure at Cal. Recruiting is a concern; while Tedford coached at Cal, it is my understanding that they did not have very high academic standards for football, and I don't see Tedford being a great recruiter at OSU. Also, the Pac 12 is a whole different ballgame than the MWC in its current incarnation, which is pretty darn weak.
In the end, I think Tedford would nothing more than a short-term fix, which, admittedly, may be exactly what we need.
As far as Novell...he's had two seasons as a head coach and a few as an OC at Arizona State. He also has a current salary (at Memphis) of >$1.8 million and seems to be in line for SEC jobs. I'm not convinced he's qualified and, even if he is, I suspect he will soon be a head coach in the SEC. I doubt OSU will be able to afford the price tag that he is likely to bring, and soon.
I like Baldwin the best out of the names I have heard and realistically believe we can get. What I would really prefer, however, is for OSU and the search firm to find a name that is a pleasant surprise; i.e., someone I have not really considered .
|
|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Nov 5, 2017 14:31:14 GMT -8
All great responses. Thanks. Important time in Beaver football, I think. Better get this one right.
|
|
|
Post by gobeavs92 on Nov 5, 2017 17:09:37 GMT -8
None of us know what will happen with the next coach and how they will do here, no matter who it is. Easy schedule or not, he has done it twice now! He has taken a team that previously won one game the year before and the next year (his first) put them in a bowl game. Anybody can skew anything to fit their point, but winning speaks for itself and Tedford is a proven winner! If you have watched their games, fundamentally, they are very good on both sides of the ball. Defensively, they are very well coached, fly around and execute well. Offensively, of course, they are putting up points and moving the ball consistently. McMaryion is getting the best coaching he has ever received at the QB position because Tedford is an elite QB coach and offensive mind. Here is what you will get with Tedford; Good/great QB play, an offense that will put points on the board and move the ball against multiple defenses, a familiarity with the PAC 12 teams, good recruiting (especially in California) and from what I have seen lately, a solid defense. I think Tedford, as all coaches do, has grown a little bit more to respect and make sure that the defensive side of the ball receives as much attention as the offensive side of the ball. When he was at Oregon as the OC under Belotti, they did not give the defense the same attention as the offense (especially in recruiting). When at Cal, he did this at times too. Let me ask, why are Norvell and Baldwin's ceilings higher or have more "upside" in your mind? Because they are younger? I'll be honest, if a guy like Bill Parcells (unrealistic example but helps prove my point) was available and wanted to coach here, I would take him over probably any coaches (let alone younger ones). Why? Well his record and pedigree speak for themselves but he would also bring in top notch assistants with experience and probably some other younger coaches to groom that could take over when he would possibly depart. In that case, there are no guarantees of how long any coach stays, young or older. This is establishing a program. So when it comes to having someone come in here and build up the program, I want someone who can do it sooner than later. I think Baldwin would struggle for a bit with recruiting a well rounded team (players in all phases) here for a few years. He might get some offensive skill talent but I doubt he'd be able to get any quality "trench" players (LOS) and defensive talent needed for PAC 12 competition for a few years at least! Part of that recruiting deficiency (IMO) would also be due to the fact that I'm not sure he could get the assistant coaches that have experience to surround him. I could be wrong but I just can't see him bringing in many if any, PAC 12 experienced coaches that would work under him (considering his lack of experience in the conference as a coach, let alone an HC). Again, I could be wrong but no more right or wrong than anyone else with their opinions, those are just my concerns with Baldwin. He obviously is a good offensive mind and has had success at FCS level as a HC. Norvell was another coach I have mentioned. I have watched Memphis a few times this season and he is pretty impressive. They do play against inferior talent, but again, the guy is winning games and they do play a good brand of football from what I have seen. He knows the PAC 12 but he does have some limited experience. Not only as an HC but even as a coordinator. Again, wouldn't dislike him being here but his inexperience might be a concern with gathering a strong group of experienced/good assistant coaches and coordinators. Also, recruiting. Would he be a well rounded recruiter? Or would he be an all in "offensive guy"? He has spent most f his coaching career on the offensive side of the ball. For the most part, no matter who is hired, I will support them as I did with GA for the first couple of seasons but then there needs to be results. I wont support Rick New-weasel or any Wing/Triple option offenses though! Another bit of food for thought about hiring a "young energetic" coach vs an experienced HC that is a proven winner. Imagine if when Riley left the first time, if DE was looked over because of age or what have you , for some younger guy? It's impossible to know, but I don't think Oregon State reaches the heights they did in Erickson's stretch (that's my opinion). He brought in; knowledge, he was a proven winner but he also brought in great assistant coaches! Go Beavs! First, thanks for respectfully disagreeing with me and offering detailed reasons as to why you have concerns about Baldwin and Norvell. I genuinely mean that. I try not to post often, because a lot of these threads result in name-calling and flat out rudeness. I have been posting more, because the prospect of a new coach is exciting and nerve-wracking. So again, thanks for the respectful post. I will attempt to reciprocate! My primary concern is Tedford's last three seasons at Cal, where he went a combined 15-22: 5-7 season, 7-5 season, and 3-9 season. The fact that it was a downward trend concerns me. What caused this to happen? Recruiting lapses? The game/conference "passing him by?" I don't have the answer for this, but if he is interviewed I would want some detailed answers as to how his tenure ended. Perhaps there are good reasons/excuses for it. Second, his health concerns me. I have zero concerns about Tedford's age. In previous posts I have mentioned that Les Miles (turns 64 sometime soon) would be a top 3 choice for me because of his background and the benefits he would bring from a recruiting and fundraising standpoint. Tedford had to resign/take an extended medical leave because of a heart procedure in 2014. Here's a link: www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000399495/article/jeff-tedford-taking-medical-leave-from-buccaneersIf his health is fine, then obviously this wouldn't be a concern for me. A terrible situation for OSU would be if Tedford had to leave after a year or two because of medical reasons. Overall, he just doesn't excite me. Again, I wouldn't necessarily be disappointed by this hire, but I wouldn't be excited either. Would we improve? Sure, I just think the ceiling could be lower than with other coaches. In response to a previous poster, I understand Cal has difficult admissions processes. GA felt the same at Wisconsin, and he still couldn't get Craig Evans into OSU. I don't think Oregon State has "easy" standards by any means. Easier than Cal's? Sure. How many "great" players are going to be in that window between OSU's admissions and Cal's admissions? Your concerns about Baldwin and Norvell are legitimate. The risks for them are greater, but I still feel the upside would also be greater. Baldwin has 9 years of head coaching experience. Coached a in multiple "real" playoffs and won a National Championship. He uses the strengths of his personnel, and he isn't stubborn in trying to utilize one particular system. Has been noted to "steal" good ideas from other coaches, and I like that he's open-minded. Your concern about his ability to get top-notch assistants is my biggest concern. I think his HC experience and his (almost 1 year) of P12 experience would be enough to make good decisions on personnel. His EWU teams averaged 42 points per game in his last year there. Think about that, his offenses averaged 6 touchdowns per game. Yes it was a Big Sky school. Again, he had Big Sky talent versus Big Sky Talent. Plus, he whooped our a$$ at home, identified Vernon Adams as a QB prospect (Banker recruited him as a DB), and beat WSU. He took UW to the wire in Peterson's first year I believe, AT UW. The Eagles scored 42 points per game in 2016, third-best in the FCS. They had a top-20 scoring offense in 2015, after they were No. 1 in 2014 and No. 7 in 2013. My point? His offenses are not only good, they are CONSISTENTLY good. Norvell just checks all the boxes for me in an "up and comer" to lead a P5 program. Coordinator experience, head coach for 1+ seasons at Memphis. Sure he plays inferior talent, but he is coaching Memphis, not Ohio State. I doubt the talent on his team is significantly greater than his opponents. His offenses are explosive, which I think would help with recruiting. 16-6 record as a HC at Memphis. Risk for Norvell? He's winning with Fuente's players, and I have no clue at how good of a recruiter he is. Anytime brother! This is a Beaver family ! We could all be more respectful to one another. I 100% agree with everything you said in your response, from beginning to end. I initially had some concerns about Tedford's health but he seems to be holding up well so far and he had some time off after the procedure but still a very valid concern. The prospect of a new HC is exciting to me as well. I'm ready to support anyone (besides my previous exceptions listed) who is hired. I think there's good and bad to any hire. One last thing that I would add in defense of Tedford, is that he really wanted this job when it last opened up. What that means? Is there an another motive? I have no clue but having someone who wants to be here has me a lot more pumped about whoever takes this job! Go Beavs!
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Nov 5, 2017 17:09:52 GMT -8
Pleeeeeeease, NO Tedford. Baldwin (all day long) > Tedford Absolutely zero evidence of that... pure speculation. Tedford is a PROVEN commodity... his last 3 years at Cal the school was in turmoil... academic entrance requirement for athlete infighting, budget fights over stadium remodel, and just the Berkeley folk being themselves. Tedford by ANY measure >>>>> Baldwin. And, that doesn't even take into consideration the quality of assistants that Tedford could draw vs Baldwin. Wilcox is a better bet to come back "home" if offered and only 50/50 he'd ask Baldwin to come with if his 1st choice would come to OSU. JW is not enamored with the area, cost of living, and huge budget restrictions/issues. And he is also >> Baldwin. At least Baldwin>Hall... but OSU can do better than either.
|
|
|
Post by beaverboilermaker on Nov 5, 2017 17:50:31 GMT -8
Good thoughts on this thread. My opinion is we could do a lot worse than either Tedford or Baldwin, but both fit my criteria with head coaching experience and a focus on the offensive side of the ball.
This might seem weird, but it happens all the time in my profession - allow a staff member to be part of the interview process for the supervisor. Give Coach Hall a 3-year deal as associate head coach / defensive coordinator, and let him help hire his boss. With the idea that he just doesn't know all the NCAA rules crap and doesn't have all the coaching and recruiting connections yet, my gut says Coach Hall would be amenable to the idea. Frankly, any HC we would hire that is not amenable to the idea would be a red flag anyway.
Ok... go ahead and KMA for a stupid idea now. I'll start - D1 football coaches have egos way too big to accept this kind of deal on either side!
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Nov 5, 2017 17:59:42 GMT -8
Pleeeeeeease, NO Tedford. Baldwin (all day long) > Tedford Absolutely zero evidence of that... pure speculation. Tedford is a PROVEN commodity... his last 3 years at Cal the school was in turmoil... academic entrance requirement for athlete infighting, budget fights over stadium remodel, and just the Berkeley folk being themselves. Tedford by ANY measure >>>>> Baldwin. And, that doesn't even take into consideration the quality of assistants that Tedford could draw vs Baldwin. Wilcox is a better bet to come back "home" if offered and only 50/50 he'd ask Baldwin to come with if his 1st choice would come to OSU. JW is not enamored with the area, cost of living, and huge budget restrictions/issues. And he is also >> Baldwin. At least Baldwin>Hall... but OSU can do better than either. Yes, maybe now. What about in a few years? Who's got the bigger upside? I think Tedford is known.
|
|
|
Post by avidbeaver on Nov 5, 2017 18:02:16 GMT -8
Personally I would rather have Baldwin over Tedford but I would be happy with either one. That being said, maybe Tedford doesn't want the job anymore. Maybe neither one of them gets the job. There are a lot of candidates out there that may be interested in the job. By the way click the link below. The details of Tedfords contract will appear. He reportedly has a buyout of 1.5 million if leaving before 2019. projects.newsday.com/college-football-coaches-salaries-contracts/jeff-tedford/
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Nov 5, 2017 18:22:01 GMT -8
Interesting comment on Wilcox by baseba1111. I'm trying to think of times a team has essentially swiped a head coach from within it's own conference.
|
|